Rio+20 summit ‘a cruel failure’

THE biggest United Nations summit on sustainable development in a decade has approved a strategy to haul more than a billion people out of poverty and cure the sickness of the biosphere.

But critics have branded the plan a cruel failure, saying it had been gutted of ambition by national interests.

The gathering of 191 UN members crowned a 10-day forum marking 20 years since the Rio Earth Summit, where leaders vowed the world would live within its environmental means.

In a sprawling 53-page statement, the three-day summit voiced dismay at entrenched poverty and mounting ecological stress.

“We . . . renew our commitment to sustainable development, and to ensure the promotion of an economically, socially and environmentally sustainable future for our planet and for present and future generations,” it says.

Entitled The Future We Want, the statement highlights the many perils facing a planet whose human population is set to surge from seven billion today to 9.5 billion by 2050.

The long list includes climate change, desertification, fisheries depletion, pollution and deforestation, and the danger that thousands of species will go the way of the dodo.

“Sustainable Development Goals” will replace the UN’s Millennium Development Goals from 2015, although defining the aim will be left for future talks – a process likely to be long and fiercely fought.

The strategy also promotes the green economy, a concept that breaks new ground in official UN terminology but is viewed suspiciously by many developing economies.

The statement also reflects the worries of advanced economies battling a deep financial crisis.

Despite the demands of developing nations for $30 billion in help, the text stipulates no funding figures to achieve sustainability goals.

UN Secretary-General, Ban Ki-moon, says the outcome “provides a firm foundation for social, economic, environmental well-being”.

“It will guide us, all of us, towards a sustainable path. It is now our responsibility to build on it,” he says.

President Dilma Rousseff told a press conference that Brazil, the host country, has secured the compromise after months of haggling.

“The consensus is a point of departure, not arrival,” she cautions.

“With this document, nations move forward. We cannot allow anyone to remain behind.

The next conference will have to be a leap forward.”

US Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, says the document “marks a real advance for sustainable development. We know this is one of the most pressing matters of our time”.

But others say a historic opportunity has been thrown away.

“The two defining challenges we face today are eradicating global poverty and managing the risks of climate change,” says British economist Lord Nicholas Stern, author of a landmark study into the costs of global warming.

“But the conference has failed to acknowledge the compelling evidence about the scale and urgency of action required.”

A registry that was opened during the conference shows that almost 700 commitments, mobilizing $513 billion, have been made for sustainable development by governments and businesses, the UN said on Friday (June 22).

It gave no details about whether the funding was new or the criteria for determining whether the projects were sustainable.

In the green movement, many activists branded Rio+20 a disappointment to rank alongside the 2009 Copenhagen climate summit, a near-fiasco.

“The only people dancing in Rio tonight will be those who continue to benefit from a broken economic model that puts profit ahead of people and planet,” says Asad Rehman of Friends of the Earth.

“Rio+20 has been a failure of epic proportions,” said Greenpeace’s executive director, Kumi Naidoo.

“We must now work together to form a movement to tackle the equity, ecology and economic crises being forced on our children. The only outcome of this summit is justifiable anger, an anger that we must turn into action.”

Mr Ban has named the Conference on Sustainable Development as the cornerstone of his plan for fairer, cleaner growth, the “No. 1 priority” of his tenure.

But talk of a summit that would draw as many 130 heads of state or government to give a push to his goals was way off the mark.

In the end, less than half of the UN’s roll call of countries sent their leader, with the remainder represented by deputies, ministers or simply chief negotiators.

Absentees included US President Barack Obama, Russian President Vladimir Putin, Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany and British Prime Minister David Cameron.